Next 50
CHUCK (season 3) (173 posts)
Post #74 in reply to post #73
9 Mar 2010
Ted
BMac

It hasn't been renewed yet, TVBytheNumbers has it on their bubble-watch.

Ted
Please note that I am an employee of NBC Universal, but my opinions as expressed on this site are solely my own and do not represent official company perspectives or opinions.
Love TV?
Ignored post from Ted. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #75 in reply to post #64
11 Mar 2010
Andrew W
A. S. V.

Just caught up on this week's and last week's, and it's not just you. I generally really like this show, but the torture references sicken me.

W.
The Post-Game Show: A bent geek blog about trash.
Very Good Taste: Food blog. Awesome food blog.
Ignored post from Andrew W. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #76 in reply to post #75
11 Mar 2010
Dork Seid
Andrew W

in fairness, I don't think there was anything comic about the torture in the most recent episode, though I don't know that the writers are bright enough to have intended it as a deliberate inversion or "see how it feels when it happens to you" in the previous ep. In previous seasons, its mostly played not-for-laughs - eg when evil spy woman is cutting on the James Bond dude.

Turns out I am the marrying kind
Ignored post from Dork Seid. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #77 in reply to post #76
11 Mar 2010
BMac
Dork Seid

I totally agree.  The last episode presented the idea of torture as fairly horrific and dangerous, although that may just be a case of OMG NOT MORGAN rather than OMG NOT TORTURE in tone.

On the other hand, I think Andrew's right.  Given the current environment it's distressing how often Chuck is willing to wink-wink nudge-nudge the comedy value of torture.  At least in 24 it seems icky.

Ignored post from BMac. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #78 in reply to post #77
12 Mar 2010
Sam
BMac

I sort of get where they'd fall into it, though. That's the whole joke with Casey -- he's a fanatical right wing Cold War spy sociopath played for laughs. I mean, they've also played his willingness to kill anyone except Ronald Reagan and his time assassinating politicians and topping nations in South America during the Cold War for laughs, at this point I just put the torture jokes in the same box.

Which doesn't mean it doesn't still play weird these days, though.

Ignored post from Sam. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #79 in reply to post #78
12 Mar 2010
A. S. V.
Sam

The problem is, there's nothing about Casey's behavior that's played as rogue -- it's official, and worse, it's routine. Maybe he's more willing to do it than, say, Sarah, but nobody acts as if what he does is out of line or in any way extraordinary.

Aaron Veenstra
web | pod | mail
Wii: 1265 0398 1520 0257
PS3: asveenstra
Ignored post from A. S. V.. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #80 in reply to post #79
12 Mar 2010
Sam
A. S. V.

Well, yeah. But the official CIA/NSA position has always been shady as hell on this show. General Beckman has been pretty cool with stuff like kidnapping and murdering civilians (including Chuck) all through the show.

I mean, it's a tricky humor line to walk, and I'm not sure it always works, but it's certainly not new. They've openly embraced a real lack of clear good and evil in the spy world. I mean, they seem to have largely forgotten FULCRUM now, but one of the bits of ambiguity I always liked was that they were almost never dealing with any foreign spies. Up until they introduced the Ring, it was all about tensions and power plays between three US spy agencies - the CIA, the NSA, and FULCRUM.

Ignored post from Sam. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #81 in reply to post #79
12 Mar 2010
Andrew W
A. S. V.

Part of the problem, for me, is that behind the 'joke' about Casey's enthusiasm for torture is the presumption that torture is effective. For writers, it's convenient to cling on to the belief that people being tortured do not lie - because it's difficult to come up with an alternative information gathering device. So the myth of torture is perpetuated in fiction, and for laughs. It's offensive, but worse, it's also lazy.

W.
The Post-Game Show: A bent geek blog about trash.
Very Good Taste: Food blog. Awesome food blog.
Ignored post from Andrew W. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #82 in reply to post #81
12 Mar 2010
Mark Schepp
Andrew W

I actually think the joke is just that Casey enjoys hurting people.  But yeah the writers should think more before going there.

-Mark

Ignored post from Mark Schepp. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #83 in reply to post #81
12 Mar 2010
Daniel 'Deadpool's Reference Guy' Coyle
Andrew W

And given the real life politics of the actor playing Casey (Hint: he writes for Breitbart), more than a little creepy.

--Dan
Ignored post from Daniel 'Deadpool's Reference Guy' Coyle. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #84 in reply to post #83
12 Mar 2010
Andrew W
Daniel 'Deadpool's Reference Guy' Coyle

Ohhhh no.

Ohhhh no no no.

W.
The Post-Game Show: A bent geek blog about trash.
Very Good Taste: Food blog. Awesome food blog.
Ignored post from Andrew W. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #85 in reply to post #84
12 Mar 2010
Vasu R
Andrew W

That is the worst thing I've seen all day.

-Vasu

Ignored post from Vasu R. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #86 in reply to post #85
12 Mar 2010
Andrew W
Vasu R

He thinks history will judge him well.

W.
The Post-Game Show: A bent geek blog about trash.
Very Good Taste: Food blog. Awesome food blog.
Ignored post from Andrew W. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #87 in reply to post #84
12 Mar 2010
Smylie-not-Smiley
Andrew W

Heh, I assume you haven't seen his Twitter feed, @adamsbaldwin, then.

smiley
Ignored post from Smylie-not-Smiley. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #88 in reply to post #87
12 Mar 2010
Andrew W
Smylie-not-Smiley

And now I have, and I've seen both where he's seemingly defended waterboarding, and where he's deleted his tweets on the subject. Why can't all actors be liberals, like they're meant to be?

W.
The Post-Game Show: A bent geek blog about trash.
Very Good Taste: Food blog. Awesome food blog.
Ignored post from Andrew W. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #89 in reply to post #88
12 Mar 2010
Ted
Andrew W

We'll always have Olmos.

Ted
Please note that I am an employee of NBC Universal, but my opinions as expressed on this site are solely my own and do not represent official company perspectives or opinions.
Love TV?
Ignored post from Ted. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #90 in reply to post #87
12 Mar 2010
Ethan Butterfield
Smylie-not-Smiley

TAW accidentally subscribed to his feed after Nathan Fillion pointed it out. Nothing like getting a steady stream of crazy fed to your phone.

Ignored post from Ethan Butterfield. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #91 in reply to post #90
12 Mar 2010
David Levine
Ethan Butterfield

I found him through Fillion's link too. I was expecting something very different. I spent 2 days a couple years ago working with him on the DAYBREAK DVDs, and he was a riot. Funny, shit-stirrer and mercilessly sarcastic. I was expecting more of that to come through on Twitter.

Ignored post from David Levine. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #92 in reply to post #91
12 Mar 2010
Daniel 'Deadpool's Reference Guy' Coyle
David Levine

Yeah, he'll always be one of my favorite actors, but he thinks Sesame Street being multicultural is a grave threat to the nation. Huh?

Obviously he keeps his politics and his work separate, though.

--Dan
Ignored post from Daniel 'Deadpool's Reference Guy' Coyle. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #93 in reply to post #92
13 Mar 2010
Erik H4LT50N
All

Actually, I'm starting to think the most appropriate pinko liberal thing to do is celebrate the man for his ability to separate the two sides of his public persona. I've enjoyed every performance he's ever given, and his politics scare me. But good for him, for his ability to be so upfront and consistent with his wack-jobbishness, even while participating in some quality NPR-listener-approved narrative works.

In other words, since William F. Buckley died, I've been looking for someone to disagree with but still respect. Baldwin may not be that guy, but it's nice to practice.

Ignored post from Erik H4LT50N. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #94 in reply to post #93
23 Mar 2010
Ross B
All

So how long are they going to go with Chuck trying to have his cake and eat it too?  I don't really see how he can be a "real spy" and still maintain his aw shucks, nice guy, I-don't-kill-people persona.  If he wants to be a "real spy" in the sense that he seems to want... killing is part of the deal. 

But still a pretty good episode, although I thought the B-plot with Casey, Lester, and Jeff was a bit weak. 


- ross
Ignored post from Ross B. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #95 in reply to post #1
30 Mar 2010
Cameron 'NOT CAM' Hughes
All

That was very very good. The Bass War 2.0. looks so fun!

Cameron Hughes
Ignored post from Cameron 'NOT CAM' Hughes. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #96 in reply to post #95
30 Mar 2010
Cameron 'NOT CAM' Hughes
All

Wow, that was dumb of me.

Cameron Hughes
Ignored post from Cameron 'NOT CAM' Hughes. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #97
6 Apr 2010
David Fetterman
All

YAY!

wishlist | email
Dave Fetterman

Ignored post from David Fetterman. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #98 in reply to post #97
6 Apr 2010
Mark Schepp
David Fetterman

So I guess the hate mail can stop for a while then?

Shaw = not dead, BTW.

-Mark

Ignored post from Mark Schepp. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #99 in reply to post #97
6 Apr 2010
Ross B
All

Definitely an enjoyable episode and one that did a nice job of tying up a lot of plots (unsurprising, since this was supposed to be the end of this season until NBC ordered five more shows).  I like the rejiggered status quo, with Team Bartowski back together (with added Morgan) and a Chuck who's able to kill, as well as the end of the will they/won't they Chuck/Sarah stuff. 

I am curious to see how far they take the Chuck/killing thing, though.  His protestations about being unwilling to kill while still yearning to be a "real spy" were always kind of awkward, especially since it really just boiled down to him not wanting to kill anyone -- he was pretty OK with Sarah or Casey doing it for him.

And ever since Sepinwall pointed it out a few weeks ago, I've definitely noticed the diminished budget this season has had.  It's noticeable not just in which cast members appeach in each episode, but in the scale of the action.  I don't think it's really a big problem, and I think for the most part they've been able to write around it pretty cleverly, but something like the scene where they attempt to capture the Director seems like it would have been much more extravagant in past seasons.


- ross
Ignored post from Ross B. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #100
7 Apr 2010
Jerry Graham
All

I'm surprised they didn't go full Die-Hard when Shaw was holding on to Sarah hanging off the bridge. 

Ignored post from Jerry Graham. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #101 in reply to post #1
27 Apr 2010
Cameron 'NOT CAM' Hughes
All

Wow, Drunken Texas Sarah is fantastic. She and Chuck really do have incredible chemistry.

Cameron Hughes
Ignored post from Cameron 'NOT CAM' Hughes. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #102 in reply to post #2
29 Apr 2010
Cameron 'NOT CAM' Hughes
All

Nobody else watched?

Cameron Hughes
Ignored post from Cameron 'NOT CAM' Hughes. To stop ignoring, click here.
Post #103 in reply to post #102
29 Apr 2010
Brian "Googleable" Gield
Cameron 'NOT CAM' Hughes

I watched. Had to time shift it though.

I'm wondering if some people didn't realize it was back on again. Don't think there was a "bump" in this thread.

Enjoyed it. Especially Sarah. Drunk Texan Sarah. Half-naked Sarah. Etc.

Also liked how they manage to keep everybody together far from Burbank.

Jeffster was almost too good - not enough camp. They looked like Simon and Garfunkel but they sang a John Denver song (I think).

I spy a possible mission in Africa coming up. Pure speculation on my part.

Ignored post from Brian "Googleable" Gield. To stop ignoring, click here.